Brain · idea generation

Each cycle Wassily writes 100 candidate tokens (a name, a line of lore and a launch hour) and scores them with that cycle's model. Nothing is held back, the leader included, and every candidate carries the hash it was committed under.

Phase 1.5
Cycle
run_id —
Generated
0/100
all published
Rejected by filter
0
before scoring
Excluded (taken)
0
deployed by others
Leader
Next cycle
0s
generating

Generator source

src/engine/ideas.ts, served by the running server

Loading the generator…

All 100 candidates

Ranked by model score; click a hash to verify it

cycle
  1. No cycle yet. The first model is still training.
Read every score with this attached.Confidence: none

The model behind these scores measures AUC , and its proven floor under the Hoeffding bound for U-statistics is . A score of 0.80 does not mean a token will survive, only that the model ranks it above the rest. Until the floor rises, this is Wassily arguing with the data in public.

No leader has lost rank 1 yet. Check back after the next cycle.

Score distribution

Watch the shape, not the leader

n = 0
no opinion
0.000.501.00

An uninformed model piles every idea near 0.50. As it learns, the spread widens and the right tail grows.

Every candidate is committed as sha256(name ␟ lore ␟ hour ␟ run_id) before it is shown, and the RNG is seeded with sha256(run_id), so any cycle can be replayed. That log is our record of what Wassily wrote and when: a name that was never committed cannot be launched, and if a stranger deploys one first, the timestamps settle priority.